Showing posts with label BUILDINGS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BUILDINGS. Show all posts

Building's - Distinct Design Approaches

The more important difference between wind and earthquake resistance lies in their basic design approaches. For wind load resistance, the structure is designed so that under the action of maximum wind loads, it remains elastic—that is, the structure is designed to suffer no permanent deformation under the worst expected storm.

The design approach is different for earthquake load resistance. The loads on a building produced by the worst expected earthquake for the location are so large that if the building were designed to remain elastic after the earthquake, it would be prohibitive in cost. Therefore, the earth-quake loads for which a building is designed may be smaller than the maximum earthquake loads expected on it.

The underlying design philosophy is that the building should remain elastic when resisting minor earthquakes. In the event of an intense earth-quake, part of the earthquake’s energy may be dissipated in permanently deforming the building, but the building must otherwise remain intact to provide complete safety to its occupants.

Permanent deformations in a structure are possible only if the structure has the ability to sustain such deformations. Materials that can sustain permanent deformation prior to failure are called   ductile  materials. Ductility is an essential property for buildings located in seismic zones but is not a requirement for resisting wind loads.

A building must not deform permanently even in the most severe windstorm. Additionally, it must be rigid enough to reduce the deflections caused by strong winds. The swaying of the upper floor of tall buildings under wind loads must be controlled to remain within acceptable limits of human tolerance.

The reverse is true for earthquake loads. Buildings must be able to deform, even permanently, to absorb the energy delivered to them by the earthquake. If brittle materials are used, they will fail under earthquake forces. Several reinforced concrete frame buildings with (brittle) unreinforced masonry infill walls between frames have collapsed or suffered serious damage under earthquake forces,  Figure 3.26   . Such buildings would generally be unharmed by violent storms.

Distinct Design Approaches
FIGURE 3.26 A typical pattern of damage to unreinforced masonry infill walls in buildings with a reinforced concrete frame structure. If the infill walls shown in this illustration had been reinforced horizontally and vertically, they would have suffered minor (or no) damage depending on the earthquake’s intensity.

WIND VERSUS EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE OF BUILDINGS

As discussed in Section 3.4, many of the structural strategies used for wind load resistance and earthquake resistance are essentially similar. Buildings are, therefore, generally designed to resist either earthquake loads or wind loads, whichever causes the worst effect (greater stresses). This is based on the assumption that there is a negligible probability of maximum wind speeds occurring at the same time as an intense earthquake. In regions of low seismic activity, wind loads govern the design of the lateral resistance of buildings; in regions of intense seismic activity, the reverse is the case.

The design of lightweight envelope components, such as glass curtain walls and roof membranes, is governed by wind loads even in highly seismic regions. (Remember that earthquake loads are influenced by the weight of the component.)  Despite the similarities between the provisions for wind load and earthquake load resistance, there are several differences in the details. An important difference is that as an earth-quake shakes the ground on which the building rests, it affects all components of the building—exterior as well as interior components. Damage to the building’s contents and injury to occupants may occur by falling interior contents,  Figure 3.24   . Thus, all compo-nents, equipment, and fixtures in a building located in a seismically active zone must be adequately anchored to remain intact during an earthquake.

FIGURE 3.24 Effect of earthquake shaking (1989 Loma Prieta earth-quake) on the contents of a building’s interior. Note that the building envelope is intact.
FIGURE 3.24 Effect of earthquake shaking (1989 Loma Prieta earth-quake) on the contents of a building’s interior. Note that the building envelope is intact.
Wind, on the other hand, acts on the building envelope. It is through the envelope that wind loads are transmitted to the building structure. If the envelope remains intact, the building will generally retain its overall structural integrity in a storm. Thus, the wind damage in a building usually begins with the damage to envelope components, such as the roof, exterior walls, exterior doors, windows, and other cladding elements. Once the building changes from fully enclosed to partially enclosed (see  Figure 3.15), the wind loads on the building increase due to the ballooning effect, which may result in additional damage or collapse of the structure, damage to interior contents, and injuries to occupants, Figure 3.25.

FIGURE 3.25 Damage to the glass curtain wall of the 37-story Bank One Building, Fort Worth, Texas, by a forceful tornado on March 28, 2000. As soon as the glass in the curtain wall shattered, substantial damage to the building’s interior (ceiling, drywall, electrical fixtures, etc.)
FIGURE 3.25 Damage to the glass curtain wall of the 37-story Bank One Building, Fort Worth, Texas, by a forceful tornado on March 28, 2000. As soon as the glass in the curtain wall shattered, substantial damage to the building’s interior (ceiling, drywall, electrical fixtures, etc.)

FIGURE 3.15 Ballooning of a building with a relatively large opening in one wall. Such a building is referred to as a partially enclosed building. A building that is not partially enclosed is called an enclosed building. Most buildings belong to the enclosed building category.
FIGURE 3.15 Ballooning of a building with a relatively large opening in one wall. Such a building is referred to as a partially enclosed building. A building that is not partially enclosed is called an enclosed building. Most buildings belong to the enclosed building category. 

BUILDING’S MASS AND DUCTILITY OF THE STRUCTURAL FRAME

From Newton’s second law of motion, the other factor that affects the magnitude of the earthquake load is the weight of the building. Lighter buildings attract a smaller earthquake load than buildings constructed of heavy materials. Thus, concrete frame and masonry structures attract a greater earthquake load than wood frame or steel frame structures. Residential structures with wood siding or stucco finishes attract a smaller earthquake load than those with brick or stone veneer.

Indeed, because of its light weight, the earthquake load on a tent is negligible even in a severe earthquake, Figure 3.22. A tent structure has the additional advantage of its built-in resistance toabsorb structural deformations (ductility)—an important structural property for earthquake regions.
Buildings constructed of heavy materials with little or no capacity to absorb deformations are among the most hazardous buildings in a seismically active zone. Such buildings include those whose structural system consists of unreinforced masonry structures (i.e., bricks, stone or concrete block walls with no vertical rein-forcement), Figure 3.23.

RAIN LOAD

Although roofs are designed to have adequate drainage so that no accumulation of water occurs, loads resulting from accidental accumulation of melted snow or rainwater must be considered as a possibility. Drains may be blocked by windblown debris or hail aggregating on the roof or the formation office dams near the drains.

Long-span, relatively flat roofs are particularly vulnerable to rainwater accumulation because, being flexible, they deflect under the weight of water. This deflection leads to yet more accumulated water, causing additional deflection, which increases accumulation. If adequate stiffness is not provided in the roof, the progressive increase of deflection can cause excessive load on the roof. Water accumulation has been the cause of complete collapse of several long-span roofs.

Generally, roofs with slope greater than 1/4 in. to 1 ft (1:48 or, say, 1:50 slope) are not subjected to accumulated rainwater unless roof drains are blocked. Building codes mandate 1/4 in. to 1 ft as the minimum slope required for roofs, which, apart from providing positive drainage, also helps to increase the life and improve the performance of roof (waterproofing) membranes.

Building codes also require that in addition to primary drains, roofs must be provided with secondary (overflow) drains. The secondary drains must be at least 2 in. above the primary drains so that if the primary drainage system gets blocked, the secondary system will be able to drain the water off the roof,   Figure 3.5.

Water accumulation generally occurs on roofs that are provided with a parapet. In the absence of a parapet, water accumulation will generally not occur. Therefore, secondary drains are not required on unparapeted roofs or on steep roofs.

ROOF LIVE LOAD

The live load on a roof takes into account the weight of repair personnel and temporary storage of construction or repair materials and equipment on the roof. Roof live load is generally given as 20 psf acting on the horizontal projected area of the roof, Figure 3.4.


This applies to a roof that will not be used in the future as a floor. If the building is expected to be extended vertically in the future, the roof live load is the floor live load for the anticipated future occupancy. Additionally, if the roof is to be landscaped, the load due to the growth medium and landscaping elements must be considered as dead load on the roof.

LIVE LOADS IN A BUILDING

While the dead load is a permanent load on the structure,   live load  is defined as the load whose magnitude and placement change with time. Such loads are due to the weights of people (animals, if the building houses animals), furniture, movable equipment, and stored materials. As shown in  Figure 3.1   , live loads are further divided into

• Floor live load
• Roof live load


Floor live load depends on the occupancy and the use of the building. Therefore, it is also called the   occupancy load,  and it is different for different occupancies. For instance, the floor live load for a library stack room is higher than the floor live load for a library reading room, which in turn is higher than the floor live load for an apartment building.

Floor live loads are determined by aggregating the loads of all people, furniture, and movable equipment that may result from the particular occupancy. Safety considerations require that the worst expected situation be considered so that the structure is designed for the maximum possible live load that may be placed on it.

Based on a large number of surveys, floor live loads for various commonly encountered occupancies, such as individual dwellings, hotels, apartment buildings, libraries, office buildings, and industrial structures, have been determined and are contained in building code tables. Table 3.1 gives floor live loads for a few representative occupancies. For instance, the floor live load for a library stack room is 150 psf, for a library reading room is 60 psf, and for an apartment building is 40 psf. Note that these are the minimum floor live loads for which the building must be designed. Even if the actual live load on a floor is smaller, the building must be designed for the minimum live load specified by the building code.

The floor live load values in Table 3.1 are conservative. In most situations, the actual loads are smaller than those given. However, the architect or the engineer must recognize unusual situations that may lead to a greater actual load than the one specified in the code. In such situations, the higher anticipated load should be used.  

Additionally, if the live load for an occupancy not included in building code tables is to be obtained, the architect or the structural engineer must determine it from first principles, taking into account all the loads that may be expected on the structure. Most building codes require that such live load values be approved by the building official.
MINIMUM FLOOR LIVE LOADS FOR  SELECTED OCCUPANCIES

DEAD LOADS IN A BUILDING

Dead loads are always present in a building; that is, they do not vary with time. They include the weights of the materials and components that comprise the structure. The dead load of a component is computed by multiplying its volume by the density of the material. Because both the densities and the dimensions of the components are known with reasonable accuracy, dead loads in a building can be estimated with greater certainty than other load types. Densities of some of the commonly used materials are given in  Table 2.


The dead load for which a building component is designed includes the self-load of the component plus the dead loads of all other components that it supports. For example, the dead load on a column includes the weight of the column itself plus all the dead load imposed on it. In Figure 3.3, the dead load on a column is the weight of the column plus the dead load from the beams and slab resting on it. Similarly, the dead load on a beam is the weight of the beam itself plus the dead load from the slab that it supports. The dead  load on the slab is only the self-weight of the slab. However, if the slab supports a floor finish, ceiling, light fixtures, or plumbing and electrical pipes, their weights must be included in the dead load acting on the slab.

DBB METHOD—INVITATIONAL BIDDING

Invitational bidding, also called   closed bidding , is another variation of the DBB method that is generally used for quasi-public and some private projects. In this method, the owner preselects general contractors who have demonstrated, based on their experience, resources, and financial standing, their qualifications to perform the work. The selected contractors are then invited to bid for the project, and the contractor with the lowest bid is then awarded the contract. The architect (as the owner’s representative) may be involved in the prescreening process.

DBB METHOD—COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL

This method is very similar to competitive sealed bidding and is commonly used for publicly funded projects. The difference between competitive sealed bidding and competitive sealed proposal methods is that the owner’s selection of the general contractor is not based on price alone but also on such other criteria as the contractor’s past experience, safety record, proposed personnel, project schedule, and so on. To ensure fairness, the advertisement and bidding documents must provide the details of the selection criteria, with relative weightings assigned to each criterion.  

DBB METHOD—COMPETITIVE SEALED BIDDING

On several publicly funded projects, the award of a construction contract to the general contractor is based on   competitive sealed bidding , also called   open bidding . This refers to the process by which qualified contractors are invited to bid on the project. The invitation is generally issued through advertisements in newspapers, trade publications, and other public media.

The advertisement for bids includes a description of the project, its location, where to obtain the bidding documents, the price of the bidding documents, the bid opening date and location, and other important information. The purpose of the advertisement is to notify and thereby attract a sufficient number of contractors to compete for the construction contract.

The general contractor’s bid for the project is based on the information provided in the bidding documents . The bidding documents are essentially the construction document set with such additional items as the instructions to bidders, requirements with respect to the  financial and technical status of bidders (see the information on surety bonds in the box  “Expand Your Knowledge”), and the contract agreement form that the successful bidder  will sign when the contract is awarded. Because these additional items are text items, they  are bound together as a project manual, Figure 1.8.

  FIGURE 1.8  The project manual in the bidding document set includes specifications and
  Division 00. After the general contractor has been selected, the project manual (in the contract
document set) generally excludes Division 00.




In the competitive sealed bidding method, the bidding documents are generally given only to contractors who are capable, by virtue of their experience, resources, and financial standing, to bid for the project. Therefore, the architect (as the owner’s representative) may prescreen the bidders with respect to their reputation and ability to undertake the project.


An exception to prescreening for the release of bidding documents involves projects funded by the federal, state, or local government, for which almost anyone can access the bidding documents. However, even in this kind of project, the number of contractors who can actually submit the bids is practically limited. This limitation is generally the result of the financial security required from the bidders, known as a   bid bond . The bidder must obtain a bid bond from a surety company in the amount specified in the bidding documents. This bond is issued based on the contractor’s experience, ability to perform the work, and financial resources required to fulfill the contractual obligations.

Whether or not the release of the bidding documents is restricted, the procedure stated earlier ensures that all the bidders are similarly qualified with respect to financial ability, experience, and technical expertise. Because all bidders receive the same information and are of the same standing, the competition is fair; therefore, the contract is generally awarded to the lowest qualified bidder.    

DESIGN-BID-BUILD PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD

In the design-bid-build method, the general contractor is selected through competition. The owner obtains multiple bids for the project from which the general contractor, who provides the “best value for money,” is selected. Within this overall approach, several  versions are available to suit the requirements of the project and the particular needs of  the owner. Collectively, these delivery versions are referred to as the   design bid-build  (DBB) method because in this version, the design, bid, and construction phases of a  project are sequential, and one phase does not begin until the previous phase has been  completed,  Figure 1.7 . Following are three commonly used versions of the DBB method  of delivery:

  •    DBB method—competitive sealed bidding (open bidding)
  •    DBB method—competitive sealed proposal
  •    DBB  method— invitational  bidding   (closed  bidding)  

  FIGURE 1.7  Sequence of operations in the design-bid-build (DBB) method of project delivery. Note that the owner’s approval is required before proceeding from one phase or stage to the next.

(BUILDING) PROJECT PREDESIGN PHASE

During the   predesign phase  (also called the   planning phase  ), the project is defined in terms of its function, purpose, scope, size, and economics. This is the most crucial of the five phases, and is almost always managed by the owner and the owner’s team. The success or failure of the project may depend on how well this phase is defined, detailed, and managed. Obviously, the clearer the project’s definition, the easier it is to proceed to the subsequent phases.

Some of the important predesign tasks are:

•    Building program definition
•    Economic feasibility assessment,  including the project’s overall budget and financing
•    Site assessment and selection,  including verifying the site’s appropriateness and determining its designated land use
•    Governmental constraints assessment,   for example, building code and zoning constraints and other legal aspects of the project
•    Sustainability rating —whether the owner would like the project to achieve the U.S. Green Building Council’s (USGBC’s) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification at some level
•    Design team selection

BUILDING (PROJECT) PROGRAM 

This includes defining the activities, functions, and spaces required in the building, along with their approximate sizes and their relationships with each other. For a house or another small project, the programis usually simple and can be developed by the owner without external assistance. For a large project, however,where the owner may be an institution (such as a corporation, school board, hospital, religious organization, or governmental entity), developing the program may be a complex exercise. This may be due to the size and complexity of the project or the need to involve several individuals—a corporation’s board  of directors, for example—in decision making. These constituencies may have different views of the project, making it difficult to create a consensus.

Program development may also be complicated by situations in which the owner has a fuzzy idea of the project and is unable to define it clearly. By contrast, experienced owners tend to have a clear understanding of the project and generally provide a detailed, unambiguous program to the architect.

It is not unusual for the owner to involve the architect and a few other consultants of the design team in preparing the program. In this instance, the design team may be hired during the predesign phase. When the economic considerations of the project are paramount, the owner may also consult a construction cost analyst.

Whatever the situation, preparing the program is the first step in the project delivery process. It should be spelled out in writing and in sufficient detail to guide the design, reduce the liability risk for the architect, and avoid its misinterpretation. If a revision is made during the progress of the project, the owner’s written approval is necessary.

BUILDING PROJECT DELIVERY PHASES

The process by which a building project is delivered to its owner may be divided into the following five phases, referred to as the   project delivery phases . Although there is usually some overlap between adjacent phases, they generally follow this order:

  •     Predesign  phase
  •     Design  phase
  •     Preconstruction  phase
  •     Construction  phase
  •     Postconstruction  phase

A NATURALLY GROWN BUILDING MATERIAL

Of the major building materials, wood is the only one that is organic in origin. This accounts for much of its uniqueness as a material of construction. Trees grow naturally in the forest, and most of the work of ÒmanufacturingÓ wood is done for us by the solar-powered processes of growth within the tree itself. This makes wood a renewable resource and inexpensive to produce: Trees need only be harvested, cut to size, and dried before they are ready for use in construction. On the other hand, we have only limited control ofthe quality and properties of wood. Unlike steel, concrete, or masonry, we can do little to refine solid wood tosuit our needs. Rather, we must accept its natural strengths and limitations.

Wood is well suited to our building structures. The tree itself is a wooden structure, a tower, erected for the purpose of displaying leaves to the sun.* The tree is sub-ject to the same forces as the buildings we erect: It supports itself against the pull of gravity; it withstands the pressures of wind and the accumulation of snow and ice on its limbs; and it resists the natural stresses of the envi-ronment, such as changes in temperature and moisture, and attack by other organisms. Wood has evolved to per-form these jobs well in the tree. Not surprisingly, it also performs them well in our buildings.

In nature, the greatest forces acting on a tree, such as the pressure of the wind, tend to act in bursts of relatively short duration. In response, wood has evolved to be strongest when resisting forces that act brieß y rather than those that act over longer periods of time. When we build with wood, we recognize this unique property. In the engineering design of a wooden structure, the maximum loads that the structure may carry are increased as the length of time these loads are expected to act decreases.

This increase, called the load duration factor, ranges from 15 to 100 percent over the basic design strength of the material and is applied to wooden structures when considering the effects of wind, snow, earthquake, and impactÑ the same types of loads the tree has evolved to withstand most effectively.

The structural form of the tree is also well suited to its environment. Tree branches are supported at one end onlyÑan arrangement called a  cantilever. The joint sup-porting a cantilevered branch must be strong and stiff, efficiently utilizing the materials structural capabilities to the utmost. Yet despite the stiffness of thejoint, the branch it supports can deß ect relatively large amounts since it is fastened at one end only. Underheavy loads, such as wet snow, the branch can droop and shed its load. Likewise, under strong winds,the tree and its branches can sway and shed much of the force acting upon them.

The trees capacity to bend and sway helps it to survive forces that might otherwise break it. When we build with wood, we cannot directly exploit the efficient structural form of the tree. The large deß  ections characteristic of this form are unsuitable for buildings. They would cause discomfort to building occupants and place undue stress on other building components.

Nor can we exploit the naturally strong joints that join a trees limbs, despite their benefits in stiffness and economy of material. In preparing wood for our uses, we cut the tree into pieces of convenient size and shape, destroying the continuity between its parts. When we reassemble these pieces, we must devise new ways to join them. Despite the many methods developed for fabricating wood connections, joints withstrength and stiffness comparable to the trees are rarely achievable. Rather, we rely on much simpler types of connections that suffice when a beam is supported at both ends.

Wood in a tree performs many functions that wood in a building does not, because wood is involved with all aspects of the trees life processes and growth. In order to meet numerous and specialized tasks, wood has evolved a complex internal structure that is highly directional.

The fact that wood is anisotropic, that is, it has different properties in different directions, affects virtually all of its properties. The direction of the grain in a piece of wood influences its production, shaping, fastening, strength, durability, aging, and beauty. No other major building material, perhaps with the exception of some specialized reinforced concrete systems, has such directional characteristics.

Consider two wood building systems, the log cabin and the heavy timber frame. Log cabin construction is appropriate to the most primitive construction technology. Logs found on or near the site are prepared for use with a minimum of labor and simple tools. Once assembled, the logs provide structural support and act as interior finish, exterior cladding, and insulation. Though a practical solution to providing shelter, log cabins use wood inefficiently and result in a structure  that is dimensionally unstable due to the large stacks of  cross-grain lumber. Where more sophisticated tools and methods are available, heavy timber takes the place of log cabin construction. In this system, wood members are assembled in ways that more closely resemble the tree form. The resulting structure is stronger, requires less material, and is more stable. A simple change in the orientation of the wood members produces a completely different building system, one that is more efficient, durable, and comfortable.

Modern developments in the wood construction materials industry reß ect efforts to overcome the limitations of wood in its natural state and to make the most  efficient use of the material. Wood panels made of ply- wood are larger and more stable than those that can  be produced from solid boards while minimizing the
adverse effects of wood grain and natural defects. Panel  products such as OSB and hardboard make use of wood waste that might otherwise be discarded. Glue-laminated and composite lumber beams can be produced in sizes and of a quality exceeding those available in solid timbers. Chemical treatments can protect wood from fire or decay. Thus, the trend is toward using wood less in its natural state and more as a raw material in sophisticated manufacturing processes to produce more refined and higher-quality construction components. Yet despite such advances, the tree itself remains an inspiration in its grace and strength, as wellas in the lessons  it offers for our understanding of building materials and methods.

*Brayton F. Wilson and Robert R. Archer, ÒTree Design: Some  Biological Solutions to Mechanical Problems,Ó BioScience, Vol. 29, No. 5, p. 293, 1979.

Waterproofing and Drainage - building substructures enclose basements, parking garages, or other usable space

Where building substructures enclose basements, parking garages, or other usable space, groundwater must be kept out. Concrete alone is rarely adequate for this purpose. Moisture can migrate through its microscopic pores, or through other pathways created by shrinkage cracks, form tie holes, utility penetrations, and the joints between concrete pours. To ensure a substructure’s resistance to water entry,
two approaches are used: drainage and waterproofing. Drainage draws groundwater away from a foundation, reducing the volume and pressure of water acting on the foundation’s walls and slabs.

Waterproofing acts as a barrier, stopping water that reaches the foundation from passing though to the interior.

Drainage, consisting of some combination of drainage backfill (well-sorted crushed stone or gravel), drainage mat, and perforated drain piping, is used with almost every building substructure (Figure 2.60). Drainage mat is a manufactured component that may be made of a loose mat of stiff, inert fibers, a plastic egg-crate structure, or some other very open, porous material. It is faced on the outside with a filter fabric that prevents fine soil particles from entering and clogging the drainage passages in the mat. Any subterranean water that approaches the wall descends through the porous material of the mat to the drain pipe at the footing. Perforated drain piping is frequently laid around the outside perimeter of a building foundation. The pipes are 4 or 6 inches (100 or 150 mm) in diameter and provide an open channel in the crushed stone bed through which water can flow by gravity either “to day-light” at a lower elevation on a sloping site, to a municipal storm sewer system, or to a sump pit that can be automatically pumped dry whenever it fills. The pipes are laid at least 6 inches (150 mm) below the top of the basement floor slab tomaintain the groundwater level safely below that of the slab. Perforations in the pipes face downward so that water is drained from the lowest possible level. Where groundwater conditions are severe, rows of perforated pipe may be installed under the basement slab as well (Figure 2.61).

Figure 2.60 Two methods of relieving water pressure around a building substructure by drainage.
The gravel drain (left) is hard to do well because of the diffi culty of depositing the
crushed stone and backfi ll soil in neatly separated, alternating layers. The drainage
mat (right) is easier and often more economical to install.

For a high degree of security against substructure fl ooding, drainage both around and under the basement is required, as seen here in a section view. Above-slab drainage is used in buildings with mat foundations.
Figure 2.61 For a high degree of security against substructure fl ooding, drainage both around and
under the basement is required, as seen here in a section view. Above-slab drainage is used
in buildings with mat foundations.

On most foundations, some form of water-repelling barrier is also used to protect against the pas-
sage of groundwater. Dampproofing is a moisture-resistant cement plaster or asphalt compound commonly applied to residential basement walls and to other substructures where groundwater conditions are mild or waterproofing requirements are not critical. Cement plaster dampproofing, or parge coating, is light gray in color and troweled on.  Asphalt or  bituminous dampproofing is dark in color and is applied in liquid form by spray, roller, or trowel. Dampproofing is less expensive and less resistant to water passage than true waterproofing.

Waterproofing, unlike dampproofing, can prevent the passage of water even under conditions of hydrostatic pressure. It is used where groundwater conditions are severe or the need to protect subgrade space from moisture is critical. Waterproof mem-branes are most commonly formulated from plastics, asphalt compounds, or synthetic rubbers and come in a great variety of forms.

Liquid waterproofing  is applied by spray gun, roller, or squeegee and then allowed to cure in place. It is easy to install and easy to form around complex shapes. When fully cured, the finished membrane is seamless and fully bonded to the underlying substrate. However, because liquid membranes are formed in the field, they are subject to uneven application, and the surfaces to which they are applied must be clean, smooth, and dry to ensure reliable adhesion of the membrane.

Preformed sheet membrane waterproofing may be adhered or mechanically fastened to substructure walls
or laid loosely over horizontal surfaces (Figure 2.62). Fabricated under controlled factory conditions, sheet membranes are reliably uniform in material quality and thickness.


A diagrammatic representation of the  placement of sheet membrane waterproofi  ng around a basement. A mud slab of low-strength concrete was poured to serve as a base for placement of the horizontal  membrane. Notice that the vertical and horizontal membranes join to wrap the  basement completely in a waterproof  enclosure.
Figure 2.62 A diagrammatic representation of the  placement of sheet membrane waterproofi  ng
around a basement. A mud slab of low-strength concrete was poured to serve as
a base for placement of the horizontal  membrane. Notice that the vertical and
horizontal membranes join to wrap the  basement completely in a waterproof  enclosure.
However, they can be more difficult to form around complex shapes, and the seams between sheets, which are sealed in the field, may be subject to lapses in quality. Sheet membranes that are loosely laid or mechanically fastened can be used over substrates that will not bond with liquid-applied or adhered sheet membranes. They are also a good choice where substrate cracking or movement may be expected, because such movement is less likely to stress or damage the membrane. An advantage of adhered membranes (both sheet and liquid) is that in the case of a defect, water cannot travel far under the membrane, limiting the extent of water damage that may occur and simplifying the tracing of leaks.

Bentonite waterproofing is made from sodium bentonite, a naturally occurring, highly expansive clay. It is most often applied as preformed sheets consisting of dry clay sand-wiched within corrugated card-board, geotextile fabric, or plastic sheets (Figure 2.63). When bentonite comes in contact with moisture, it swells to several times its dry volume and forms an impervious barrier to the further passage of water. Bentonite sheets can be placed directly on the soil under a concrete slab on grade or mechanically attached to uncured, damp concrete walls. In slurry form, bentonite can  be sprayed even onto highly irregular, rough stone walls. The swelling behavior of bentonite clay also allows it to adjust to cracking and  movement in the substrate.

Waterproofi ng in progress on a  concrete foundation. Leftmost: the bare foundation wall remains exposed.  Middle: bentonite waterproofi ng panels are fastened in place. These panels are  lined on the outer face with a black- colored, high-density plastic that adds to  the waterproofi ng qualities of the panel.   Right: drainage mat has been installed  over the waterproofi ng. The mat’s outer face of fi lter fabric is lightly dimpled,  telegraphing the egg crate structure of the underlying molded plastic panel.  The top edge of the mat is secured in place with an aluminum termination bar  that holds the panel in place and keeps dirt and debris from falling behind the  panel. Lower right: white perforated drain piping can be seen, temporarily  supported on wood blocking and running alongside the footing. (Photo by  Joseph Iano)
Figure 2.63 Waterproofi ng in progress on a  concrete foundation. Leftmost: the
bare foundation wall remains exposed.  Middle: bentonite waterproofi ng panels
are fastened in place. These panels are  lined on the outer face with a black-
colored, high-density plastic that adds to  the waterproofi ng qualities of the panel.
Right: drainage mat has been installed  over the waterproofi ng. The mat’s outer
face of fi lter fabric is lightly dimpled,  telegraphing the egg crate structure of
the underlying molded plastic panel.  The top edge of the mat is secured in
place with an aluminum termination bar  that holds the panel in place and keeps
dirt and debris from falling behind the  panel. Lower right: white perforated
drain piping can be seen, temporarily  supported on wood blocking and
running alongside the footing. (Photo by  Joseph Iano)

Integral waterproofing includes cementitious plaster or crystalline admixtures for concrete or mortar
that react chemically to stop up the pores of these materials and render them watertight. It may be applied
to the surface of existing concrete or masonry or used as an admixture in new concrete. Unlike most other waterproofing materials, many integral waterproofing materials can be applied as  negative side waterproof-
ing, that is, applied to the inner side of a concrete wall acting to resist water passage from the opposite side.

Blind-side waterproofing is installed prior to the pouring of concrete walls. This occurs most commonly when a substructure wall is built close to a property’s edge, and excavation cannot be enlarged beyond the property line to permit workers access to the outer face of the wall after its construction.

Drainage matting is first applied directly to the excavation sheeting, and then any of a number of possible waterproofing membranes are applied over the drainage mat. Later, the concrete wall is poured against the membrane. The sheeting remains permanently in place (Figure 2.64).

Blind-side waterproofi ng is used where there is no working space between a sheeted excavation and the outside of the foundation wall. The drainage mat and waterproof membrane are applied to the sheeting; then the basement wall is poured against them.
Figure 2.64
Blind-side waterproofi ng is used where there is no working space between a sheeted excavation and the outside of the foundation
wall. The drainage mat and waterproof membrane are applied to the sheeting; then the basement wall is poured against them.
Joints in construction require special attention to ensure water-tightness. Preformed waterstops made of plastic, synthetic rubber, or metal can be cast into the mating concrete edges of both moving and nonmoving joints to block the passage of water (Figures 2.65 and 2.66). Waterstops for nonmoving joints such as between concrete pours of a wall or slab can also be made of strips of bentonite or mastic that are temporarily adhered to the edge of one pour. After the adjacent pour is complete, these stops remain embedded in the joint, where they form a watertight barrier (Figure 2.67).

 A synthetic rubber waterstop is used to seal against water penetration at movement joints and at joints between pours of concrete in a foundation. The type shown here is split on one side so that its halves can be placed fl at against the formwork where another wall will join the one being poured. After the concrete has been poured and cured and the formwork has been removed from the fi  rst wall, the split halves are folded back together before the next wall is poured.
Figure 2.65 A synthetic rubber waterstop is used
to seal against water penetration at
movement joints and at joints between
pours of concrete in a foundation. The
type shown here is split on one side so
that its halves can be placed fl at against
the formwork where another wall will join
the one being poured. After the concrete
has been poured and cured and the
formwork has been removed from the
first wall, the split halves are folded back
together before the next wall is poured.

Most waterproofing  systems are inaccessible once building construction is complete; they are ex-
pected to perform for the life of the building, and even small defects in installation can allow the passage of large volumes of water.

For these reasons, waterproofing membranes are inspected carefully during construction and horizontal  membranes are often  flood  tested (submerged for an extended period time while leak-checking is  performed) to detect the presence of defects while repairs can still be easily made. Once inspection and testing are complete, membranes are covered with a  protection board, insulation board, or drainage matting to shield the membrane from prolonged exposure to sunlight and  to prevent physical damage during  soil backfilling or subsequent construction operations.

A rubber waterstop ready for the next pour of a concrete wall, as diagrammed in Figure 2.65. (Courtesy of Vulcan Metal Products, Inc., Birmingham, Alabama)
Figure 2.66
A rubber waterstop ready for the next pour of a concrete wall, as diagrammed in
Figure 2.65. (Courtesy of Vulcan Metal Products, Inc., Birmingham, Alabama)
A bentonite waterstop is adhered to a concrete footing prior to casting of the concrete wall above. Later, if groundwater seepage occurs, the bentonite will swell to fully seal the joint between the two pours. The waterstop is positioned to the side of the steel reinforcing bars closer to the wall’s exterior, also protecting the reinforcing from moisture and corrosion. However, because of bentonite’s expansive force, the waterstop must not be positioned too close to the surface of the wall, or when it swells, it could cause portions of concrete to split away or spall.
Figure 2.67
A bentonite waterstop is adhered to
a concrete footing prior to casting
of the concrete wall above. Later,
if groundwater seepage occurs, the
bentonite will swell to fully seal the joint
between the two pours. The waterstop
is positioned to the side of the steel
reinforcing bars closer to the wall’s
exterior, also protecting the reinforcing
from moisture and corrosion. However,
because of bentonite’s expansive force,
the waterstop must not be positioned
too close to the surface of the wall, or
when it swells, it could cause portions of
concrete to split away or spall.

GEOTEXTILES - CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING

Geotextiles are flexible fabrics made of chemically inert  plastics that are highly resistant to deterioration in the soil. They are used for a variety of purposes relating to site development and the foundations of buildings.

As described in the accompanying text, in earth reinforcement  or  soil reinforcement, a plastic mesh fabric or grid is used to support an earth embankment or retaining wall. The  same type of mesh may be utilized in layers to stabilize engineered fill beneath a shallow footing (Figure A), or to stabilize marginal soils under driveways, roads, and airport runways, acting very much as the roots of plants do in preventing the movement of soil particles.

Another geotextile that is introduced later in this chapter is drainage matting, an open matrix of plastic filaments with a feltlike filter fabric laminated onto one side to keep soil particles from entering the matrix. In addition to providing free drainage around foundation walls, drainage matting is often used beneath the soil in the bottoms of planter boxes and under heavy paving tiles on rooftop terraces, where it maintains free passage for the drainage of water above a waterproof membrane.


GEOTEXTILES - CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING

Synthetic filter fabrics are wrapped over and around subterranean crushed stone drainage layers such as the one frequently used around a foundation drain. In this position, they keep the stone and pipe from gradually
becoming clogged with fine soil particles carried by the groundwater. Similar fabrics are used at grade during construction, acting as temporary barriers to filter soil out of water that runs off a construction site, thus preventing contamination of lakes, streams, or stormwater systems.

Special geotextiles are manufactured to stake down on freshly cut slopes to prevent soil erosion and encour-age revegetation; some of these are designed to decay and disappear into the soil as plants take over the function of slope stabilization. Another type of geotextile is used for weed control in landscaped beds, where it allows rainwater to penetrate the soil but blocks sunlight, preventing weeds from sprouting.

UNDERPINNING - Stabilizing the Foundations of a Building

Underpinning is the process of  strengthening and stabilizing the  foundations of an existing building.

It may be required for any of several reasons: The existing foundations may never have been adequate to carry their loads, leading to excessive settlement of the building over time. A change in building use or
additions to the building may over-load the existing foundations. New construction near a building may disturb the soil around its foundations or require that its foundations be carried deeper. Whatever the cause, underpinning is a highly specialized task that is seldom the same for any two buildings. Three different alternatives are available when foundation capacity needs to be increased: The foundations may be enlarged; new, deep foundations can be inserted under shallow ones to carry the load to a deeper, stronger stratum of soil; or the soil itself can be strengthened by grouting or by chemical treatment. Figures 2.53 and 2.54 illustrate in diagrammatic form some selected concepts of underpinning.

Two methods of supporting a building while carrying out underpinning work beneath its foundation, each shown in both elevation  and section. (a) Trenches are dug beneath the existing foundation at intervals, leaving the majority of  the foundation supported by the soil. When portions of the new foundations have been completed in the trenches, using one of the types of underpinning shown in Figure 2.54, another set of trenches is dug between them and the remainder of the foundations is completed. (b) The foundations of an entire wall can be exposed at once by needling, in which the wall is supported temporarily on needle beams threaded through holes cut in the wall. After underpinning has been accomplished, the jacks and needle beams are removed and the trench is backfi  lled
Figure 2.53 Two methods of supporting a building while carrying out underpinning work beneath its foundation,
each shown in both elevation  and section. (a) Trenches are dug beneath the existing foundation at intervals, leaving the majority of  the foundation supported by the soil. When portions of the new foundations have been completed
in the trenches, using one of the types of underpinning shown in Figure 2.54, another set of trenches
is dug between them and the remainder of the foundations is completed. (b) The foundations of an
entire wall can be exposed at once by needling, in which the wall is supported temporarily on needle
beams threaded through holes cut in the wall. After underpinning has been accomplished, the jacks
and needle beams are removed and the trench is backfi  lled
Three types of underpinning. (a) A new foundation wall and footing are constructed beneath the existing foundation. (b) New piles or caissons are constructed on either side of the existing foundation. (c) Minipiles are inserted through the existing foundation. Minipiles do not generally require excavation or temporary support of the building.
Figure 2.54 Three types of underpinning. (a) A new foundation wall and footing are constructed beneath the existing
foundation. (b) New piles or caissons are constructed on either side of the existing foundation. (c)
Minipiles are inserted through the existing foundation. Minipiles do not generally require excavation or
temporary support of the building.

Buildings Seismic Base Isolation

In areas where strong earthquakes are  common, buildings are sometimes placed on base isolators. When signifi cant ground movement occurs, the  base isolators flex or yield to absorb a  significant portion of this movement;  as a result, the building and its sub- structure move significantly less than  they would otherwise, reducing the  forces acting on the structure and  lessening the potential for damage.

A frequently used type of base isolator is a multilayered sandwich of rubber and steel plates (Figure 2.52).

The rubber layers deform in shear  to allow the rectangular isolator to  become a parallelogram in cross section in response to relative motion  between the ground and the building. A lead core deforms enough to  allow this motion to occur, provides  damping action, and keeps the layers  of the sandwich aligned.

Base isolation.
Figure 2.52 Base isolation.

Shallow Foundations - Building Construction

Most shallow foundations are simple concrete  footings. A  column footing is  a square block of concrete, with or  without steel reinforcing, that accepts  the concentrated load placed on it  from above by a building column and spreads this load across an area of soil large enough that the allowable bearing stress of the soil is not exceeded.

A wall footing or  strip footing is a continuous strip of concrete that serves the same function for a loadbearing wall (Figures 2.30 and 2.31).

A column footing and a wall footing of concrete. The steel reinforcing bars have  been omitted from this illustration for clarity.
Figure 2.30 A column footing and a wall footing of
concrete. The steel reinforcing bars have  been omitted from this illustration for
clarity.
These concrete foundation walls for an apartment building, with their steel formwork not yet stripped, rest on wall footings. For more extensive illustrations of wall and  column footings
Figure 2.31 These concrete foundation walls for an apartment building, with their steel formwork
not yet stripped, rest on wall footings. For more extensive illustrations of wall and  column footings
To minimize settlement, footings are usually placed on undisturbed soil.  Under some circumstances, footings
may be constructed over engineered fill,  which is earth that has been deposited under the supervision of a soils engineer. The engineer, working from the results of laboratory compaction tests on samples taken from the soil used for filling, makes sure that the soil is deposited in thin layers at a controlled moisture content and compacted in accordance with detailed procedures that ensure a known loadbearing ca-pacity and long-term stability.

Footings appear in many forms in different foundation systems. In  climates with little or no ground frost, a concrete  slab on grade with thickened edges is the least expensive foundation and floor system that one can use and is applicable to one- and two-story buildings of any type of construction (see Chapter 14 for further
information on slabs on grade). Or, in colder regions the edges of a slab on grade may be supported with deeper wall footings that bear on soil below the frost line. For floors raised above the ground, either over a  crawlspaceor a  basement, support is provided by concrete or masonry foundation walls supported on concrete strip footings (Figure 2.32). When building on slopes, it is often necessary to step the footings to maintain the re-quired depth of footing at all points around the building (Figure 2.33). If soil conditions or earthquake precau-tions require it, column footings on steep slopes may be linked together with reinforced concrete  tie beams to avoid possible differential slippage between footings.


 Three types of substructures with shallow foundations. The slab on grade  is the most economical under many circumstances, especially where the  water table lies near the surface of the ground. A crawlspace is often used under  a floor structure of wood or steel, and gives much better access to underfloor  piping and wiring than a slab on grade. Basements provide usable space for  building occupants.
Figure 2.32 Three types of substructures with
shallow foundations. The slab on grade  is the most economical under many
circumstances, especially where the  water table lies near the surface of the
ground. A crawlspace is often used under  a floor structure of wood or steel, and
gives much better access to underfloor  piping and wiring than a slab on grade.
Basements provide usable space for  building occupants.
Foundations on sloping sites, viewed in a cross section   through the building. The broken line indicates the  outline of the superstructure. Wall footings are stepped to  maintain the necessary distance between the bottom of the  footing and the surface of the ground. Separate column  foundations, whether caissons, as shown here, or column  footings, are often connected with reinforced concrete  tie beams to reduce differential movement between the  columns. A grade beam differs from a tie beam by being  reinforced to distribute the continuous load from a bearing  wall to separate foundations.
Figure 2.33 Foundations on sloping sites, viewed in a cross section
 through the building. The broken line indicates the
outline of the superstructure. Wall footings are stepped to
maintain the necessary distance between the bottom of the
footing and the surface of the ground. Separate column
foundations, whether caissons, as shown here, or column
footings, are often connected with reinforced concrete
tie beams to reduce differential movement between the
columns. A grade beam differs from a tie beam by being
reinforced to distribute the continuous load from a bearing
wall to separate foundations.
Footings cannot legally extend beyond a property line, even for a building built tightly against it. If the outer
toe of the footing were simply cut off at the property line, the footing would not be symmetrically loaded by the column or wall and would tend to rotate and fail. Combined footings and cantilever footings solve this problem by tying the footings for the outside row of columns to those of the next row in such a way that any rotational tendency is neutralized (Figure 2.34).
Either a combined footing (top) or a  cantilevered footing (bottom) is used  when columns must abut a property  line. By combining the foundation for  the column against the property line,  at the left, with the foundation for the  next interior column to the right in a  single structural unit, a balanced footing  design can be achieved. The concrete  reinforcing steel has been omitted from  these drawings for the sake of clarity.
Figure 2.34 Either a combined footing (top) or a
cantilevered footing (bottom) is used
when columns must abut a property
line. By combining the foundation for
the column against the property line,
at the left, with the foundation for the
next interior column to the right in a
single structural unit, a balanced footing
design can be achieved. The concrete
reinforcing steel has been omitted from
these drawings for the sake of clarity.
In situations where the allowable bearing capacity of the soil is low in relation to the weight of the build-
ing, column footings may become large enough that it is more economical to merge them into a single mat or  raft foundation that supports the entire building. Mats for very tall buildings may be 6 feet (1.8 m) thick
or more and are heavily reinforced (Figure 2.35).

Pouring a large foundation mat. Six truck-mounted pumps receive concrete from a  continuous procession of transit-mix concrete trucks and deliver this concrete to the  heavily reinforced mat. Concrete placement continues nonstop around the clock until  the mat is finished to avoid “cold joints,” weakened planes between hardened concrete  and fresh concrete. The soil around this excavation is supported with a sitecast concrete  slurry wall. Most of the slurry wall is tied back, but a set of rakers is visible at the lower  right.
Figure 2.35 Pouring a large foundation mat. Six truck-mounted pumps receive concrete from a
continuous procession of transit-mix concrete trucks and deliver this concrete to the
heavily reinforced mat. Concrete placement continues nonstop around the clock until
the mat is finished to avoid “cold joints,” weakened planes between hardened concrete
and fresh concrete. The soil around this excavation is supported with a sitecast concrete
slurry wall. Most of the slurry wall is tied back, but a set of rakers is visible at the lower
right.
Where the bearing capacity of the soil is low and settlement must be carefully controlled, a  floating foundation is sometimes used. A floating foundation is similar to a mat foundation, but is placed beneath a building at a depth such that the weight of the soil removed from the excavation is equal to the weight of the building above. One story of ex-cavated soil weighs about the same as five to eight stories of superstructure, depending on the density of the soil and the construction of the building  (Figure 2.36).
A cross section through a building with  a floating foundation. The building  weighs approximately the same as the  soil excavated for the substructure, so  the stress in the soil beneath the building  is the same after construction as it was  before.
Figure 2.36 A cross section through a building with
a floating foundation. The building
weighs approximately the same as the
soil excavated for the substructure, so
the stress in the soil beneath the building
is the same after construction as it was
before.

EXCAVATION - BUILDING

At least some excavation is required for every building. Organic topsoil is subject to decomposition and to
shrinking and swelling with changes in moisture content. It is excellent for growing lawns and landscape plants but unsuitable for supporting buildings. Often, it is scraped away from the building area and stockpiled to one side for redistribution over the site after construction of the building is complete. After the topsoil has been removed, further digging is necessary to place the footings out of reach of water and wind erosion. In colder climates, foundations must be placed below the level to which the ground freezes in winter, the frost line, or they must be insulated in such a way that the soil beneath them cannot freeze.

Otherwise, a foundation can be lifted and damaged by soil that expands slightly as it freezes. Or, under certain soil and temperature conditions, upward migration of water vapor from the pores in the soil can result in the formation of  ice lenses, thick layers of frozen water crystals than can lift foundations by even larger amounts.

Excavation is required on many sites to place the footings at a depth where soil of the appropriate bearing capacity is available. Excavation is frequently undertaken so that one or more levels of basement space can be added to a building, whether for additional habitable rooms, for parking, or for mechanical equipment and storage. Where footings must be placed deep to get below the frost  line or reach competent soil, a basement is often bargain-rate space, adding little to the overall cost of the building.

In particulate soils, a variety of excavating machines can be used to loosen and lift the soil from the ground: bulldozers, shovel dozers, backhoes, bucket loaders, scrapers, trenching machines, and power shovels of every type. If the soil must be moved more than a short distance,
dump trucks come into use.

In rock, excavation is slower and many times more costly. Weak or highly fractured rock can sometimes be broken up with power shovels, tractor-mounted rippers, pneumatic hammers, or drop balls such as those used in building demolition. Blasting, in which explosives are placed  and detonated in lines of closely spaced holes drilled deep into the rock, is often necessary. In devel-oped areas where blasting is impractical, rock can be broken up with hydraulic splitters.

⇒ Excavation Support   If the site is sufficiently larger than the area to be covered by the building, the edges of the excavation can be sloped back or benched at an angle such that the soil will not slide back...

⇒ Dewatering   During construction, excavations must be kept free of standing water. Such water may come from precipitation or it may come from ground-water seepage originating from any of...