Showing posts with label PILE FOUNDATIONS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PILE FOUNDATIONS. Show all posts

Pile Materials - Foundations.

Piles may be made of timber, steel, concrete, and various combinations of these materials (Figure 2.47). Timber piles have been used since Roman times, when they were driven by large mechanical hammers hoisted by muscle power. Their main advantage is that they are economical for lightly loaded foundations. On the minus side, they cannot be spliced during driving and are, therefore, limited to the length of available tree trunks, approximately 65 feet (20 m). Unless pressure treated with a wood pre- servative or completely submerged below the water table, they will decay (the lack of free oxygen in the water prohibits organic growth). Relatively small hammers must be used in driving timber piles to avoid splitting them. Capacities of individual timber piles lie in the range of 10 to 55 tons (9000 to 50,000 kg).

Two forms of steel piles are used, H-piles and pipe piles.  H-piles are special hot-rolled, wide-flange sections, 8 to 14 inches (200 to 355 mm) deep,  which are approximately square in cross section. They are used mostly in end bearing applications. H-piles displace relatively little soil during driving. This minimizes the upward displacement of adjacent soil, called heaving, that sometimes occurs when many piles are driven close together. Heaving can be a particular problem on urban sites, where it can lift adjacent buildings.

 Cross sections of common types of piles. Precast concrete piles may be square or round instead of the octagonal section shown here and may be hollow in the larger sizes.
Figure 2.47 Cross sections of common types of piles.
Precast concrete piles may be square or
round instead of the octagonal section
shown here and may be hollow in the
larger sizes.
 H-piles can be brought to the site in any convenient lengths, welded together as driving progresses to form any necessary length of pile, and cut off with an oxyacetylene torch when the required depth is reached. The cutoff ends can then be welded onto other piles to avoid waste. Corrosion can be a problem in some soils, however, and unlike closed pipe piles and hollow precast concrete piles, H-piles cannot be inspected after driving to be sure they are straight and undamaged.
Allowable loads on H-piles run from 30 to 225 tons (27,000 to 204,000 kg).

Steel pipe piles have diameters of  8 to 16 inches (200 to 400 mm). They  may be driven with the lower end either open or closed with a heavy steel  plate. An open pile is easier to drive  than a closed one, but its interior  must be cleaned of soil and inspected before being filled with concrete,  whereas a closed pile can be inspected  and concreted immediately after driving. Pipe piles are stiff and can carry  loads from 40 to 300 tons (36,000 to 270,000 kg). They displace relatively  large amounts of soil during driving,  which can lead to upward heaving of  nearby soil and buildings. The larger  sizes of pipe piles require a very heavy  hammer for driving.

Minipiles, also called  pin piles or micropiles, are a lightweight form of  steel piles made from steel bar or  pipe 2 to 12 inches (50 to 300 mm) in  diameter. Minipiles are inserted into  holes drilled in the soil and grouted in  place. When installed within existing  buildings, they may also be forced into the soil by hydraulic jacks pushing downward on the pile and upward on the building structure. Since no hammering is required, they are a good  choice for repair or improvement of  existing foundations where vibrations from the hammering of conventional piles could damage the existing structure or disrupt ongoing activities within the building (Figure 2.54).

Where vertical space is limited, such as when working in the basement of an existing building, minipiles can
be installed in individual sections as short as 3 feet (1 m) that are threaded end-to-end as driving progresses.

Minipiles can reach depths as great as 200 feet (60 m) and have working capacities as great as 200 to 300 tons (180,000 to 270,000 kg). 

Precast concrete piles are square, octagonal, or round in section, and in large sizes often have open cores to  allow inspection (Figures 2.47–2.49).
 Precast, prestressed concrete piles. Lifting loops are cast into the sides of the piles as crane attachments for hoisting them into a vertical position.
Figure 2.48 Precast, prestressed concrete piles. Lifting loops are cast into the sides of the piles as
crane attachments for hoisting them into a vertical position.
A driven cluster of six precast concrete piles, ready for cutting off and capping.
Figure 2.49 A driven cluster of six precast concrete
piles, ready for cutting off and capping.
Most are prestressed, but some for smaller buildings are merely rein-forced (for an explanation of prestressing, see pages 544–548). Typical cross-sectional dimensions range from 10 to 16 inches (250 to 400 mm) and bearing capacities from 45 to 500 tons (40,000 to 450,000 kg).

Advantages of precast piles include  high load capacity, an absence of corrosion or decay problems, and, in
most situations, a relative economy of cost. Precast piles must be handled carefully to avoid bending and cracking before installation. Splices be-tween lengths of precast piling can be made effectively with mechanical fastening devices that are cast into the ends of the sections.

A  sitecast concrete pile is made by driving a hollow steel shell into the ground and filling it with concrete. The shell is sometimes corru-gated to increase its stiffness; if the corrugations are circumferential, a  heavy steel mandrel (a stiff, tight-fitting liner) is inserted in the shell  during driving to protect the shell  from collapse, then withdrawn before concreting. Some shells with  longitudinal corrugations are stiff  enough that they do not require  mandrels. Some types of mandrel- driven piles are limited in length,  and the larger diameters of sitecast piles (up to 16 inches, or 400 mm)  can cause ground heaving. Load ca- pacities range from 45 to 150 tons  (40,000 to 136,000 kg). The primary  reason to use sitecast concrete piles  is their economy.

There is a variety of proprietary  sitecast concrete pile systems, each  with various advantages and disad- vantages (Figure 2.50). Concrete  pressure-injected footings (Figure 2.51)  share characteristics of piles, piers,  and footings. They are highly resistant to uplift forces, a property that  is useful for tall, slender buildings in  which there is a potential for overturning of the building, and for ten- sile anchors for tent and pneumatic  structures. Rammed aggregate piers and  stone columns  are similar to pressure- injected footings, but are constructed  of crushed rock that has been densely compacted into holes created by  drilling or the action of proprietary  vibrating probes.

Some proprietary types of sitecast concrete piles. All are cast into steel casings that have been driven into the ground; the uncased piles are made by withdrawing the casing as the concrete is poured and saving it for subsequent reuse. The numbers refer to the methods of driving that may be used with each: 1. Mandrel driven. 2. Driven from the top of the tube. 3. Driven from the bottom of the tube to avoid buckling it. 4. Jetted. Jetting is accomplished by advancing a high-pressure water nozzle ahead of the pile to wash the soil back alongside the pile to the surface. Jetting has a tendency to disrupt the soil around the pile, so it is not a favored method of driving under most circumstances
Figure 2.50 Some proprietary types of sitecast concrete piles. All are cast into steel casings that have
been driven into the ground; the uncased piles are made by withdrawing the casing as the
concrete is poured and saving it for subsequent reuse. The numbers refer to the methods
of driving that may be used with each: 1. Mandrel driven. 2. Driven from the top of the
tube. 3. Driven from the bottom of the tube to avoid buckling it. 4. Jetted. Jetting is
accomplished by advancing a high-pressure water nozzle ahead of the pile to wash the soil
back alongside the pile to the surface. Jetting has a tendency to disrupt the soil around the
pile, so it is not a favored method of driving under most circumstances
Steps in the construction of a proprietary pressure-injected, bottom-driven concrete pile footing. (a) A charge of a very low-moisture concrete mix is inserted into the bottom of the steel drive tube at the surface of the ground and compacted into a sealing plug with repeated blows of a drop hammer. (b) As the drop hammer drives the sealing plug into the ground, the drive tube is pulled along by the friction between the plug and the tube. (c) When the desired depth is reached, the tube is held and a bulb of concrete is formed by adding small charges of concrete and driving the concrete out into the soil with the drop hammer. The bulb provides an increased bearing area for the pile and strengthens the bearing stratum by compaction. (d, e) The shaft is formed of additional compacted concrete as the tube is withdrawn. (f) Charges of concrete are dropped into the tube from a special bucket supported on the leads of the driving equipment.
Figure 2.51
Steps in the construction of a proprietary pressure-injected, bottom-driven concrete pile footing. (a) A charge of a very low-moisture
concrete mix is inserted into the bottom of the steel drive tube at the surface of the ground and compacted into a sealing plug with
repeated blows of a drop hammer. (b) As the drop hammer drives the sealing plug into the ground, the drive tube is pulled along by
the friction between the plug and the tube. (c) When the desired depth is reached, the tube is held and a bulb of concrete is formed
by adding small charges of concrete and driving the concrete out into the soil with the drop hammer. The bulb provides an increased
bearing area for the pile and strengthens the bearing stratum by compaction. (d, e) The shaft is formed of additional compacted
concrete as the tube is withdrawn. (f) Charges of concrete are dropped into the tube from a special bucket supported on the leads of
the driving equipment.

Pile Driving - Durability- Steel Structures.

It is important that the long-term performance of the structure is considered both in the choice of structural form and in the design of construction details. Failure to do so may result in maintenance problems requiring costly repair.

1 Corrosion allowances
The means for countering the effect of corrosion of steel piles are well developed.
Guidance is given in the British Steel Piling Handbook.

BS 80028 considers that the end of the effective life of a steel sheet pile occurs when the loss of section, due to corrosion, causes the stress to reach the specified minimum yield strength. A pile section chosen for the in-service condition has to be adequate at its end-of-design-life, at which time the effective pile section will have been reduced by corrosion.

As the corrosion loss allowance varies along the pile according to the corrosion environment, the designer needs to be aware that the maximum corrosion may occur at a different level to that of the maximum forces and moments, and should allow for this accordingly.

Also, since redistribution of earth pressures may occur as a result of increased flexure of a corroded section, the end-of-design-life condition may be a critical design load case in the selection of the sheet pile section.

2 Corrosion and protection of steel piles
The design life requirements for proposed buildings and individual components or assemblies are defined in BS 7543 Guide to durability of buildings and building elements, where a building design life can range from 10 years for a building with a ‘short’ life to 120 years for civic and other high quality buildings. A retaining wall which is part of a building structure, i.e. a basement, must therefore comply with these requirements and be designed with sacrificial thicknesses  applied to each surface, depending on the exposure conditions. The exposure conditions are based on the advice given in BS 8002 clause 4.4.4.4.3 and are shown in Table 29.4.
 Table 29.4 Sacrificial thicknesses for piling according to BS 8002
Sacrificial thicknesses for piling according to BS 8002
Another way of allowing for sacrificial thickness is to use a higher strength steel than would be required if no corrosion were assumed (i.e. use steel grade S355GP, to BS EN 10248, in a wall designed for steel grade S270GP).This permits a greater loss of metal before stresses become critical

It should be noted that the corrosion allowances apply to unprotected steel piles.
Although it is generally cost effective to provide the sacrificial steel thickness, consideration can alternatively be given to the following corrosion protection options:

• Protective coatings, particularly in the exposed section of the pile.
• Cathodic protection in soil below the water table or in a marine environment.

Details of these options are given in the British Steel Piling Handbook.


3 Corrosion in fill or industrial soils
Buildings can be constructed in areas of recent fill or industrial soils. Corrosion protection of the steel in contact with the fill material may be required, and this can be assessed by testing the material for pH and resistivity.

The nature of in situ fill soils can be variable, and a full soil analysis is required to assess the likely corrosion performance of steel in the environment. Soil tests to determine the pH of the soil should be in accordance with BS 1377-353 and as directed by the contract to determine resistivity. Other tests may be relevant, and
most of these are reviewed in CIRIA’ s series of reports on contaminated land (contact CIRIA for further details).

In a controlled fill, no special measures are required, and the same corrosion rates as in natural undisturbed soils can be assumed.

Corus (formerly British Steel) has undertaken significant research and development into corrosion of steel and corrosion protection. Further advice on corrosion assessment and protection can be obtained from Corus Construction Centre or from
The Steel Construction Institute.

4 Corrosion and structural forces
It is not immediately obvious whether the start of in-service life case or the end-of-design-life case will be the most critical for the structural design of retaining walls.

At the end-of-design-life, the reduced stiffness of the corroded steel pile will permit increased deflection, which will in turn reduce the soil pressures acting upon it (and therefore the induced moments and shears).

As the corrosion loss allowance varies along the pile according to the corrosion environment, the designer should consider that the maximum corrosion may not occur at the same level as the maximum section stresses.

The reduced (corroded) section properties can be obtained either by calculation or from the British Steel Piling Handbook or other Corus brochure.

Pile Driving and Installation.

1 Steel pile installation tolerances
Information on tolerances that are achievable using commonly available pile driving
equipment and methods is quoted in the Institution of Civil Engineers publication


Specification for piling and specifications issued by the Federation of Piling
Specialists, the CEN Standard EN 12063 Execution of special geotechnical works – Sheet-pile walls, and the TESPA publication Installation of steel sheet piles.

Table 29.3 is included in the TESPA publication and represents tolerance levels for sheet piling which should not be too onerous to achieve but will give results which are visually acceptable – an important feature for permanent exposed sheet piling.


Steel pile driving tolerances (TESPA)
Steel pile driving tolerances (TESPA)

Accuracy of alignment will also be affected by pile stiffness, the driving equipment, and the experience of the workforce.Use of pile guide frames,which are often formed from universal beams aligned with their webs horizontal, will ensure that good alignment of the sheet piles is achieved.

2 Environmental factors: noise and vibration prediction

Increasing attention has been directed to environmental factors with regard to driven piles in recent years. Although the duration of the piling contract may be short in comparison with the whole contract period, noise and vibration perception may be more acute during the piling phase. Human perception is very intolerant of noise and vibration or shock transmitted through the ground, and tolerance requires careful prior education of the public. Efforts made to advise the public and to plan the precise times of driving carefully can reassure those likely to be affected in the vicinity of a pile installation and can result in the necessary cooperation.

In the UK, the Control of Pollution Act (1974) provides a legislative framework for, amongst other things, the control of construction site noise. The Act defines noise as including vibration and provides for the publication and approval of codes of practice, the approved code being BS 5228. Part 4 of the code deals specifically with piling noise. This code was revised in 1992 to include guidance on  vibration.

Two relevant documents include the TRRL Research Report RR53  Ground vibration caused by civil engineering works, and the British Steel publication Control of vibration and noise during piling.

The SCI publication Specifiers’ Guide to Steel Pilingalso contains useful advice. BS 6472 deals specifically with evaluation of human exposure to noise and vibration in buildings.



2.1 Noise from piling operations

Pile driving is perceived to be an inherently noisy operation because impact-based methods of installation have historically been used.Typical data on noise levels produced by piling operations have been published by CIRIA Report No. 64 Noise from construction and demolition sites – Measured levels and their prediction.

These are discussed and interpreted in CIRIA Report PG9 Noise and vibrations from piling operations. It is important to note that modern pile installation equipment such as the noise-free pile jacking machines will not be included as they post date these publications.

Impact driving of steel sheet piling is often noisy since the operation involves steel-to-steel contact. In areas where severe restrictions are placed on noise levels, pile vibratory or jacking equipment should be used.
Such machines emit a different frequency and lower level of noise which may be acceptable, and recent advances in noise reduction technology can ensure that the noise from the auxiliary power pack is also lowered.

2.2 Ground vibrations caused by piling

It is widely recognized that noise and vibration, although related, are not amenable to similar curative treatment. In the main, noise from a site is airborne and consequently the prediction of noise levels is relatively straightforward, given the noise characteristics and mode of use of the equipment. On the other hand, the transmission of vibration is determined largely by site soil conditions and the particular nature of the structures involved. General guidance can be derived from the study of case histories of similar situations. Useful references on the subject of ground vibrations are provided by CIRIA Technical Note 142 Ground-borne vibrations arising from piling, the publication  Dynamic ground movements – Man-made vibrations in ground movements and their effects on structures, and BRE Digest No. 403 Damage to structures from ground-borne vibration.

Sheet Piles Types - Steel Strucures.

In the UK, two profiles, designated as U and Z, are available. U profiles are also commonly referred to as Larssen sections and Z profiles as Frodingham sections.

See Fig. 29.11. In addition, where the depth of excavation is small, trench sheet sections may be used as alternatives to sheet piles.

The essential difference between these sections and ordinary structural beams is their ability to interlock with each other to form a continuous membrane in the soil. (Sections and their properties are included in Appendices.) Steel sheet piling, including sections for box piles, is produced in accordance with BS EN 10248, the most typical grades being S270GP and S355GP with yield strengths of 270N/mm2
and 355N/mm2 respectively. In addition, higher-strength steel sheet piles can be obtained to grades S390GP and S430GP (yield strengths 390N/mm2 and 430N/mm2  respectively).

 Larssen and Frodingham sheet piles
Fig. 29.11 Larssen and Frodingham sheet piles

Sheet Piles Benefits - Steel Strucures.

Benefits of the use of steel sheet piling include:

• Construction is faster than that for reinforced concrete walls
• Are a narrow form of construction, which can be installed close up to the boundary of the site, maximizing usable building space
• Suitable for all soil types
• No requirement to excavate for wall foundations
• No disturbance of existing ground or arisings unlike that for bored concrete piling
• The steel components are factory quality as opposed to site quality
• High ductility that can reduce bending stresses and soil reactions
• Can easily be made aesthetically pleasing
• Can be placed in advance of other works
• Immediate load-carrying capacity
• Forms a ‘curtain walling’ to contain the working site
• They are a ‘sustainable’ product as they can be extracted easily and minimize waste

Sheet Piles Uses - Steel Strucures.

There are various types of earth-retaining structures.Where a differential surface level is to be established with a vertical interface, a retaining wall is used. Steel sheet piling is one form of retaining wall construction. Sheet piles resist soil and water pressures by functioning as a beam spanning vertically between points of support, as shown in Fig. 29.10.

Steel sheet piles are used for temporary and permanent retaining walls. In tem- porary works and cofferdams the sheet piles enable deep excavations to be made to facilitate construction below ground and water level of other permanent works.

On completion of construction the sheet piles are usually extracted for reuse on other projects.

More recent applications have seen the use of sheet piles as permanent retaining walls. Structures include basements, underground carparks and abutments for bridges including integral bridges.

Sheet pile retaining wall
Fig. 29.10 Sheet pile retaining wall

Steel Piles Installation.

Steel piles can be installed by a variety of methods and equipment.There are three types of installation equipment, which operate by impact, vibration or by jacking.

Each has particular advantages and disadvantages, and the final choice is, in most cases, a balance between speed and economy of installation. A further deciding element is the increasing concern for noise and vibration control to which the industry has responded with the development of new installation equipment such as hydraulic hammers.

The installation of steel piles is a specialist activity, calling for considerable knowledge and experience of handling piles and hammers to achieve an acceptable placement within specified tolerances of position and level. Guidance on the practical limits that can be achieved in position and level for driven steel piles is available from the FPS (Federation of Piling Specialists) and in the TESPA (Technical

European Sheet Piling Association) publication  Installation of steel sheet piles.

Guidance is also included at the back of the new ICE Specification for Piling and Embedded Retaining Walls and in the Corus Piling Handbook.

The designer should refer to these documents before carrying out a design, because the advice given will often affect the details at connections to the pile cap in the structure.

There is much to gain from matching the stiffness of the pile to the hammer and to the anticipated soil resistance at the site to achieve satisfactory driveability and to ensure achievement of the required design penetration.

In addition, following research work over the last 30 years, there is a developing understanding of the benefits of measuring the soil resistance during driving as a check on the designer’s predicted compressive axial static capacity (see the ICE

Specification for Piling and Embedded Retaining Walls).Although there are some caveats to be applied to this practice, it is indisputable that  both designer and installer gain from using dynamic analysis of pile driving and that this is of ultimate benefit to their clients in many ways. For instance, it is a QA tool to permit the evaluation of piles that have an unexpectedly high resistance at a higher level; it can lead to fewer and shorter piles being acceptable; it can save construction time by avoiding delays; and it provides an equitable means of resolving disputes about specifications that turn out to be unrealistic due to inadequate site investigation or inaccuracy in design prediction methods.

The relationship between the static and dynamic capacity is now better under- stood, and in many soils and rocks there is very little difference between them.

However, it is still sound practice to carry out static load testing to check the design penetration because in some soils pile capacity has been known  to decrease after driving. Test piles should therefore have both static and dynamic measurements in order to relate the two, and then dynamic pile analysis can be used to check the project piles.

1 Determining bearing capacity
The safe load capacity of driven steel piles should be verified.The only certain way to do this is by static test loading. Unfortunately, to do this for every pile is neither practical nor economic for most projects.

Alternative ways of load testing piles are by stress wave analysis using the CAPWAP program21
and a dynamic pile analyser.

Pile head settlement is most accurately determined by static test load. Dynamic formulae give no indication of this but stress wave analysis will give an indication the technique is rapidly improving.

Static test loading
Two forms of test loading are in general use, but the maintained load method is considered the more accurate.Details of both test methods are given in BS 8004 clauses 7.5.5 and 7.5.6.

Excessive conservatism has been found in current practice and in the currently used specifications for load testing piles, which has been compounded by unrealistic design assumptions on the soil parameters that are used in pile resistance prediction methods to determine a ‘working load’. This has led to costly overdesign of
piling.

The amount of kentledge or tension resistance should always be in excess of the estimated ultimate bearing capacity of the pile.A factor of 1.5 should be a minimum, since loading to twice the ‘working’ or ‘serviceability’ load is the accepted requirement, and the working load is normally about half the ultimate capacity in both  LSD and ASD procedures.

In the maintained increment load test (MLT), kentledge or adjacent tension piles or soil anchors are used to provide a reaction for the test load applied by jack(s) placed over the pile being tested. Figure 29.8 shows a typical arrangement.The load is increased in defined steps, and is held at each level of loading until all settlement has either ceased or does not exceed a specified amount in a stated period of time.


Test load arrangement using kentledge
Fig. 29.8 Test load arrangement using kentledge

A plot of load versus head settlement (Fig. 29.9) provides an understanding of pile head performance, which is an essential requirement for ensuring compatibility between superstructure and foundation, but it reveals only part of the picture of overall pile performance.

Load–settlement plot
Fig. 29.9 Load–settlement plot

Elastic shortening can be significant in steel piles, especially those which are long and fully stressed in grade S355 quality. Such shortening is of no consequence provided it is anticipated and allowed for in design and evaluation.

2 Pile-driver calibration
To overcome the need to test load every pile, careful records taken during the driving of a subsequently satisfactorily test-loaded pile can be used to evaluate later piles. This system is reliable when the hammer, pile size, pile length, and geology remain unchanged for subsequent piles. However, as soon as any one of these elements is changed, further test loading and recalibration is required.

3 Dynamic formulae
These were an early attempt to relate the energy output of the impact hammer and the pile penetration per blow of the hammer to the static resistance of the pile.There are a number of such formulae available and they date from the 1920s but all have proved to be unreliable and are no longer used.

4 Dynamic stress wave analysis
Dynamic methods have gained wide acceptance and are embodied in the new ICE Specification for Piling and Embedded Retaining Walls. Direct on-site computer analysis of pile gauge readings provides information on pile toe resistance, pile shaft resistance, pile shaft integrity, and actual energy input to the pile head.

This form of evaluation provides valuable information as the pile is driven, which is an ideal arrangement. However, it still relies on relating dynamic resistance and ‘set’ to static resistance, and care must be taken to ensure the results are not mis-leading.Redrive checks at ‘set’ are essential, and a cross-check by static loading may be advisable at the start of a large contract.

Redrive checks must be carried out to ensure that the resistance of the pile does not change after driving is completed.This is most likely to occur if pore water pressures in the soil are altered by the action of driving the piles.

5 Design stresses during driving
A driven pile is usually driven to a resistance of twice the working load or to ultimate bearing capacity to demonstrate an adequate factor of safety. BS EN 12699 embodies offshore practice where it states that the maximum dynamic stress in the shaft during driving should be limited to be less than 90% of yield.

Steel Piles - Design Basis.

1 Design basis
The basis of design of any bearing pile is its ultimate axial capacity in the particular soil conditions at the site where the structure is to be built.The design resistance is determined from the ultimate capacity, and the designer verifies that this is adequate to carry the required loads from the structure.

Until recently, design resistance of foundations has been evaluated on an allowable stress basis. However, structural design is now using a limit state design (LSD) basis, whereby partial factors are applied to various elements of the design according to the reliability of the method and of the soil properties. However, the application of limit state design philosophy to geotechnical design is causing difficulty in a discipline where the allowable stress approach and terms such as the ‘allowable bearing pressure’, ‘permissible steel stress’, and ‘allowable pile capacity’ are widely accepted and understood. Nevertheless, the LSD approach is being progressively adopted in the British Standards as they are revised, and is the basis for all the Eurocodes, including that for foundation design.

2 Design standards
The common design standard used for the design of bearing piles is the offshore industry’s recommended practice for steel tubular piles, based on US and UK North Sea experience, which is contained in the American Petroleum Institute Code RP2A (API RP2A) that will be adopted in the ISO Code 13819-2.

A draft of the new Eurocode 7: Part 16 has recently been produced after several years of effort by an eminent team, and the UK pre-standard DD-ENV 1997-17 with the National Application Document (NAD), was published in July 1995. It presents a more rigorous treatment of limit state design (LSD) than any of the British Standards relating to foundations so far.Allowable stress design (ASD) is still, however, permitted in BS 80028 and BS 6349, in order to be compatible with the approach taken in BS 449.

Combi-piles - Steel Structures.

Combi-piles are another form of part-fabricated piling used to form walls for deep excavations. The wall is formed from alternating tubular and sheet piles as shown in Fig. 29.4. The number of sheets between the tubes varies dependent on the required section modulus. The tubular piles take vertical loads and stiffen the wall.

Tubular piles are available in a wide variety of sizes, and both Larssen and Frodingham sheet piles are suitable as infill piles.Appropriate clutches are welded to the walls of the tubes, and these provide the designer with simple corner details for many different wall angles. It is apparent that the clutch locking bar strips from U-section sheet piles (or Larssen sections) are more stable to weld onto the tubulars than those from Frodingham section sheet piles.

Combi-piles
Fig. 29.4 Combi-piles

High Modulus Piles - Steel Structures.

Buttressing a sheet pile wall with deep universal beams placed  in ‘soldier’ fashion creates a high modulus pile wall as shown in Fig. 29.3. This section provides additional moment capacity and bearing capability. The UBs are welded to the back of a pair of Frodingham sheet piles and all three are driven together clutched to the next panel.

High modulus piles
Fig. 29.3 High modulus piles

Box Sheet Piling - Steel Structures.

Hot-rolled steel sheet piling is more extensively used nowadays in permanent as well as temporary retaining walls. Applications are not only above-ground earth-retaining structures but also composite basement wall construction, urban railway and road cuttings, bridge abutments, river bridge pier caissons, as well as the traditional river and coastal protection works. Economic design is enabled by better knowledge of soil–structure interaction and highly developed design and analysis programmes.

Box piles are particularly suitable for marine structures, such  as jetties and dolphins, where part of the pile shaft is exposed above seabed level and the pile functions as a free-standing column or is connected at the head in clusters of columns.

Box piles are formed by welding two or more sheet pile sections together. Both Larssen and Frodingham steel sheet piles (see section 29.2.3) can be used.They can be introduced into a line of sheet piling at any point where local heavy loads are to be applied, for instance beneath bridge beams, or used separately.They are clutched together with adjacent sheet piles and can be positioned in a sheet pile abutment so that its appearance is unaffected.

Larssen box piles are formed by welding together two sheet pile sections with continuous welds, and Frodingham plated box piles are formed by  continuously welding a plate to a pair of interlocked and intermittently welded sheet piles (see Fig. 29.2).

Special box piles can be formed using other combinations of sheet piles. Further information can be obtained from steel manufacturers.

Box piles
Fig. 29.2 Box piles

Tubular Piles - Steel Structures.

Tubular piles were first used as foundations for offshore oil platforms in the oil fields of Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela in the 1920s. Initially, spare oil pipe was used out of convenience but, as the supporting structures became more sophisticated, the cold rolling of piles in structural plate to project-specific diameters and wall thicknesses became more common.
 

Purpose-rolled tubular piles can be used, but high quality steel line pipe is perfectly suitable for piling. Tubular piles are available in a large range of diameters and wall thicknesses. Typical sections used for piling purposes are produced as line pipe to API 5L grades X52 (yield stress of 52ksi, approximately equal to 355N/mm2) to X80 (yield stress of 80ksi, approximately equal to 555N/mm2).

Tubular sections can be hot- or cold-rolled. The cold-rolling process produces consistently higher yield strengths than those of hot-rolled steel products and this can have significant benefits for highly loaded bearing pile and structural column-pile applications, and can also permit harder driving.
 

Steel tubular piles have a high stiffness and are therefore also suitable for sites where it is necessary to transfer bearing loads into buried bedrock. They are particularly suitable for marine structures, especially where sited in deep water, e.g. berthing jetties for deep draught vessels. Increasing use is being made of steel tubulars in composite columns for buildings and bridges where the tube is first driven as a pile before filling the upstand above ground level with a reinforced concrete core for added strength and rigidity. This permits significant savings in cost due to faster construction.More applications will become possible as the results of research into the effects of pile driving, dynamic load testing, corrosion, and new coatings are analysed and reported to design engineers.

Universal Bearing Piles - Steel Structures.

Universal bearing piles are H-sections produced on a universal hot rolling mill–hence their name.They are essentially the same as universal column sections, except that they have uniform thickness throughout the section. See Fig. 29.1. Universal column H-piles are made in two basic qualities of steel, grade S275 (yield  = 275N/mm2) and grade S355 (yield = 355N/mm2) to BS EN 10025. Typical section sizes are presented in the Appendices.
 

Steel H-piles are very efficient in providing a large surface area for generating shaft friction resistance. In any given foundation plan area, a greater number of  steel H-piles can be used in a group with a standard spacing of 2B (or 2 x dia.) than concrete piles and either the load supported can be greater or the size of the group made smaller.The stiffness of H-piles is different about each orthogonal axis, allowing designers to select the orientation necessary to achieve the most efficient design.


Universal bearing pile
Fig. 29.1 Universal bearing pile

H-piles are used principally for terrestrial structures where the full length of the pile is embedded, e.g. foundations for bridges and buildings, and therefore buckling is not a problem because there is good soil lateral support.They are used very effectively to transfer bearing loads into buried bedrock and to get around buried obstructions. It is sometimes advisable to use special cast steel pile shoes to strengthen the tip and prevent damage or buckling under hard driving conditions into bedrock where very high end bearing pressure can be achieved.

They are generally not the most suitable for conditions where long lengths of the pile shaft protrude above ground level and are unsupported by surrounding soil or through water, because buckling failure about the minor axis can occur at relatively low axial loads. In these cases consider the use of tubular or box piles that have more stiffness.

Types of Steel Piles.

Steel bearing piles are available in three basic profiles: universal column H-sections, tubular sections and box piles. In addition steel sheet piles, High Modulus Piles and Combi-piles can be used to support vertical load as well as a soil retaining function.

1 Universal bearing piles   Universal bearing piles are H-sections produced on a universal hot rolling mill–hence their name.They are essentially the same as universal column sections, except that they have...

2 Tubular piles   Tubular piles were first used as foundations for offshore oil platforms in the oil fields of Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela in the 1920s. Initially, spare oil pipe was used out of...

3 Box sheet piling

4 High modulus piles

5 Combi-piles

Uses of Bearing Piles - Steel Structures.

Bearing piles are used mainly to support vertical loads for which the main design requirements are to restrict average settlement to a reasonable amount, eliminate differential settlement, and achieve an adequate factor of safety or load factor against overload.

Steel piling offers many advantages compared with other types including:

• Reduced foundation construction time and site occupation
• Reliable section properties without need for onsite pile integrity checking
• Inherently high strength to weight ratio
• Higher end bearing resistance in granular soils and rocks mobilized by pile driving as compared with boring
• Pile load capacity can be confirmed during driving by dynamic pile analysis (DPA) on each pile
• Low displacement of adjacent soils during driving and no arisings
• Easily removed for site reinstatement
• Reusable or recyclable following extraction
• Closer spacing possible.

The ability to be transported and handled without concern for overstressing due to self-weight is an important consideration where piles need to be lifted, pitched and driven in long lengths, e.g.maritime structures. Steel piles can withstand high driving stresses, thereby enabling them to be installed without significant damage through difficult strata such as brownfield sites and subsurface layers of boulders or weath- ered rock. Energy-absorbing structures such as jetties and dolphins can be particularly well constructed in steel by virtue of its ability to offer large elastic deformation

and bending strength without affecting its durability. On projects such as river or estuary crossings, steel piles offer clear advantages, as the soils are typically granular and waterlogged and unsuitable for satisfactory pile boring. New applications such as supports and abutments for integral bridges offer more  economic con- struction methods and the property of compliance under lateral loading that reduces bending stresses and therefore section requirements.

Pile Load Tests.

Pile load tests have been previously discussed. As shown in Fig. 6.19, the pile load test can take a considerable amount of time and effort to properly set-up. Thus only one or two load tests are often recommended for a particular site.

The location of the pile load tests should be at the most critical area of the site, such as where the bearing stratum is deepest or weakest. The first step involves driving or installing the pile to the desired depth. In Fig. 16.32, the small arrows point to the prestressed concrete piles that have been installed and are founded on the bearing strata. The next step is to install the anchor piles, which are used to hold the reaction frame in place and provide resistance to the load applied to the test piles. The most common type of pile load test to determine its vertical load capacity is the simple compression load test (i.e., see “Standard Test Method for Piles Under Static Axial Compressive Load,” ASTM D 1143-94, 2004). A schematic set-up for this test is shown in Fig. 16.33 and includes the test pile, anchor piles, test beam, hydraulic jack, load cell, and dial gauges. Figure 16.34 shows an actual load test where the reaction frame has been installed on top of the anchor piles and the hydraulic loading jack is in place. A load cell is used to measure the force applied to the top of the pile. Dial gauges, such as shown in Fig. 16.35, are used to record the vertical displacement of the piles during testing.

Pile load test. The small arrows point to the prestressed concrete piles that will be subjected to a load test. The large arrow points to one of the six anchor piles.
FIGURE 16.32 Pile load test. The small arrows point to the prestressed concrete piles that will
be subjected to a load test. The large arrow points to one of the six anchor piles.


Schematic setup for applying vertical load to the test pile using a hydraulic jack acting against an anchored reaction frame.
FIGURE 16.33 Schematic setup for applying vertical load to the test pile using a hydraulic jack acting
against an anchored reaction frame.


Pile load tests. The reaction frame has been set up and the hydraulic jack and load cell are in place.
FIGURE 16.34 Pile load tests. The reaction frame has been set up and the hydraulic jack and
load cell are in place.


Pile load tests. This photograph shows one of the dial gauges that are used to record the vertical displacement of the top of the pile during testing.
FIGURE 16.35 Pile load tests. This photograph shows one of the dial gauges that are used to
record the vertical displacement of the top of the pile during testing.

As the load is applied to the pile, the deformation behavior of the pile is measured. The pile is often subjected to a vertical load that is at least two times the design value. In most cases, the objec- tive is not to break the pile or load the pile until a bearing capacity failure occurs, but rather to confirm that the design end-bearing parameters used for the design of the piles are adequate. The advantage of this type of approach is that the piles that are load-tested can be left in-place and used as part of the foundation. Figure 16.36 presents the actual load test data for the pile load test shown in Figs. 16.34 and 16.35. For this project, the prestressed concrete piles were founded on solid bedrock and thus the data in Fig. 16.36 show very little compression of the pile. In fact, the recorded displacement of the pile was almost entirely due to elastic compression of the pile itself, instead of deformation of the bearing strata.
Figure 16.37 shows a commonly used method of analysis for static axially compressive or tension load testing of piles.

Pile load test data.
FIGURE 16.36 Pile load test data. This plot shows the actual data recorded from the pile load test shown
in Figs. 16.34 and 16.35. The vertical deformation is the average displacement recorded by the dial gauges.
The axial load is determined from a load cell.

Method of analysis for static axially compressive or tension load testing of piles.
FIGURE 16.37 Method of analysis for static axially compressive or tension load testing
of piles. (Reproduced from NAVFAC DM-7.2, 1982.)

Construct the Remainder of the Foundation - Piles.

Prestressed Concrete Piles - Excavation and Construction.

After the piles have been successfully installed, the next step is to construct the remainder of the foundation, as follows:

1. Cut-off top of piles. Especially for the indicator piles, the portion of the pile extending above ground surface may be much longer than needed. In this case, the pile can be cut-off or the concrete chipped-off by using a jackhammer, such as shown in Fig. 16.26.

2. Grade beam excavation. The next step is to excavate the ground for the grade beams that span between the piles. Figure 16.27 shows the excavation of a grade beam between two piles. For the foundation shown in Fig. 16.27, there is only one pile per cap, thus the pile caps are relatively small as compared to the size of the grade beams.

Those prestressed piles that broke during installation should also be incorporated into the foundation. For example, in Fig. 16.27, the pile located at the bottom of the picture is the same broken pile shown in Fig. 16.25. The replacement pile, which was successfully installed to the bearing strata, is located at a distance of 5 ft (1.5 m) from the broken pile (i.e., the pile near the center of Fig. 16.27). As previously mentioned, replacement piles should be installed in-line with the grade beam. As shown in Fig. 16.27, both the broken pile and the replacement pile will be attached to the grade beam; however, the broken pile will be assumed to have no support capacity.

Prestressed concrete piles have been installed and the excavations for the pile caps and grade beams are complete. The strands at the top of the pile will be connected to the steel reinforcement in the pile cap and grade beam.
FIGURE 16.26 Prestressed concrete piles have been installed and the
excavations for the pile caps and grade beams are complete. The strands
at the top of the pile will be connected to the steel reinforcement in the
pile cap and grade beam.

The prestressed concrete pile at the bottom of the pic- ture is the same pile shown in Fig. 16.25. The pile near the center of the photograph is the replacement pile. The broken pile and the replacement pile will be attached to the grade beam.
FIGURE 16.27 The prestressed concrete pile at the bottom of the pic-
ture is the same pile shown in Fig. 16.25. The pile near the center of the
photograph is the replacement pile. The broken pile and the replacement
pile will be attached to the grade beam.

Once the grade beams have been excavated, the next step is to trim the top of the prestressed piles such that they are relatively flush, such as shown in Figs. 16.28 and 16.29. The strands at the top of the pile are not cut off because they will be tied to the steel reinforcement in the grade beam in order to make a solid connection at the top of the pile.


The excavation for the grade beams is complete and the top of the prestressed piles are trimmed so that they are relatively flush
FIGURE 16.28 The excavation for the grade beams is complete and the
top of the prestressed piles are trimmed so that they are relatively flush.


FIGURE 16.29 Close-up view of one of the presstressed piles showing a trimmed top surface with the strands extending out of the top of the pile.
FIGURE 16.29 Close-up view of one of the presstressed piles showing a trimmed top surface
with the strands extending out of the top of the pile.

3. Installation of steel in grade beams. After the pile caps and grade beams have been excavated, the next step is to install the steel reinforcement. Figure 16.30 shows a close-up view of the top of a prestressed concrete pile with the steel reinforcement from the grade beam positioned on top of the pile. Note in Fig. 16.30 that the strands from the prestressed pile are attached to the reinforcement steel in the grade beams. This will provide for a solid connection between the pile and the grade beam. Figure 16.31 presents an overview of the grade beam with the steel reinforcement in place and the grade beam ready for the placement of concrete.

Close-up view of the top of a prestressed pile with the steel reinforcement from the grade beam positioned on top of the pile. The strands from the pile are attached to the steel reinforcement in the grade beam.
FIGURE 16.30 Close-up view of the top of a prestressed pile with the steel reinforcement
from the grade beam positioned on top of the pile. The strands from the pile are attached to the
steel reinforcement in the grade beam.





 Overview of the steel reinforcement positioned within the grade beam excavation.
FIGURE 16.31 Overview of the steel reinforcement positioned within
the grade beam excavation.




4. Floor slab. Before placement of the floor slab, the visqueen moisture barrier and a gravel cap-
illary break should be installed. Then the steel reinforcement for the floor slab is laid-out and the
final step is to place the concrete for the floor slab.

5. Columns. When designing the building, the steel columns that support the superstructure can be positioned directly over the center of the pile caps.

Similar to the pier and grade beam foundation, the main advantage of the prestressed pile foundation is that there are no open joints or planes of weakness that can be exploited by soils movement or seismic shaking. The strength of the foundation is due to its monolithic construction, with the floor slab attached and supported by the grade beams, which are in turn anchored by the pile caps and the prestressed piles. In addition, the steel columns of the superstructure can be constructed so that they bear directly on top of the pile caps and have fixed-end connections. This monolithic foundation and the solid connection between the steel columns and piles will enable the structure to resist soils move- ment and seismic shaking.

Usually the structural engineer will design this foundation system. The geotechnical engineer provides various design parameters, such as the estimated depth to the bearing strata, the allowable endbearing resistance, allowable skin friction in the bearing material, allowable passive resistance of the bearing material, and any anticipated downdrag loads that could be induced on the piles if the upper loose or compressible soil should settle under its own weight or during an anticipated earthquake. The geotechnical engineer should also perform pile load tests and inspect the foundation during construction in order to confirm the design recommendations.

Prestressed Concrete Piles - Excavation and Construction.

Common types of prestressed concrete piles are shown in "FIGURE 5.5 Typical prestressed concrete piles; dimensions in millimeters."  Prestressed piles are typically produced at a manufacturing plant and the first step is to set-up the form, which contains the prestressed strands that are surrounded by wire spirals. The concrete is then placed within the form and allowed to cure. Once the concrete has reached an adequate strength, the tensioning force is released, which induces a compressive stress into the pile. The prestressed piles are then loaded onto trucks, transported to the site, and stockpiled such as shown in Fig. 16.21.

Solid square concrete piles, such as shown in Fig. 16.21, are the most commonly used type of prestressed piles. As shown in Fig. 16.21, the end of the pile that will be driven into the ground is flush, while at the opposite end; the strands protrude from the concrete. The main advantage of prestressed concrete piles is that they can be manufactured to meet site conditions. For example, the prestressed concrete piles shown in Fig. 16.21 were manufactured to meet the following specifications: 12 in. (0.3 m) square piles

Design load = 70 tons (620 kN) per pile
Required prestress = 700 psi (5 MPa)
28 day compressive stress = 6000 psi (40 MPa)
Maximum water-cement ratio = 0.38
Portland cement type V (i.e., high sulfate content in the soil)

Prestressed concrete piles stockpiled at the job site.
FIGURE 16.21 Prestressed concrete piles stockpiled at the job site.

Large pile-driving equipment, such as shown in Fig. 16.22, is required in order to drive the piles into place. If the piles are to be used as end-bearing piles and the depth to the bearing strata is variable, then the first step is to drive indicator piles. An indicator pile is essentially a prestressed pile that is manufactured so that it is longer than deemed necessary. For example, if the depth to adequate bearing material is believed to be at a depth of 30 ft (9 m), then an indicator pile could be manufactured so that it is 35 ft (11 m) long. Usually about 10 to 20 percent of the piles will be indicator piles. The indicator piles are used to confirm embedment conditions and thus some indicator piles may be driven near the locations of prior borings, while other indicator piles are driven in areas where there is uncertainty as to the depth of the bearing strata. Once the indicator piles have been driven, the remainder of the prestressed piles are manufactured with the lengths of the piles based on the depths to bearing strata as determined from the indicator piles.

Pile driving equipment. A prestressed concrete pile is in the process of being hoisted into position.
FIGURE 16.22 Pile driving equipment. A prestressed
concrete pile is in the process of being hoisted into position.

It is always desirable for the geotechnical engineer to observe the driving conditions for the prestressed piles. Prior to driving the piles, basic pile driving information should be recorded (see Table 16.6). In addition, during the actual driving of the piles, the number of blows per foot of penetration should be recorded. The pile-driving contractor typically marks the pile in one-foot increments so that the number of blows per foot can be easily counted.


TABLE 16.6 Example of Pile-Driving Information that should be Recorded for the Project
Example of Pile-Driving Information that should be Recorded for the Project



Table 16.7 presents actual data during the driving of a prestressed pile. At this site, soft and liquefiable soil was encountered at a depth of about 15 to 30 ft (4.6 to 9.2 m) below ground surface.

 TABLE 16.7 Actual Blow Count Record Obtained during Driving
of a Prestressed Concrete Pile
Actual Blow Count Record Obtained during Driving of a Prestressed Concrete Pile


Although the blows per foot at this depth were reduced to about one per foot, the driving contractor actually allowed the hammer to free fall and thus the energy supplied to the top of the pile was significantly less than at the other depths. For the data in Table 16.7, the very high blow counts recorded at a depth of 31 ft (9.5 m) are due to the presence of hard bedrock that underlies the soft and loose soil. Figure 16.23 shows the completed installation of the prestressed concrete pile. The wood block shown on the top of the concrete pile in Fig. 16.23 was used as a cushion in order to protect the pile top from being crushed during the driving operation.

 A prestressed concrete pile has been successfully driven to the bearing strata. The wood block shown on the top of the concrete pile was used as a cushion in order to protect the pile top from being crushed during the driving operation.
FIGURE 16.23 A prestressed concrete pile has been successfully driven to the bearing strata.
The wood block shown on the top of the concrete pile was used as a cushion in order to protect
the pile top from being crushed during the driving operation.



A major disadvantage of prestressed concrete piles is that they can break during the driving process. The most common reason for the breakage of a prestressed concrete pile is because it strikes an underground obstruction, such as a boulder or large piece of debris that causes the pile to deflect laterally and break. For example, Fig. 16.24 shows the lateral deflection of a prestressed concrete pile as it was driven into the ground. In some cases, the fact that the pile has broken will be obvious.

Lateral displacement of a prestressed concrete pile during the driving operations
FIGURE 16.24 Lateral displacement of a prestressed concrete pile during the driving operations.




In Fig. 16.25, the prestressed concrete pile hit an underground obstruction, displaced laterally and then broke near ground surface. In other cases where the pile breaks well below ground surface, the telltale signs will be a continued lateral drifting of the pile and low blow counts at the bearing strata.

FIGURE 16.25 This prestressed concrete pile struck an underground obstruction, displaced
laterally, and broke near ground surface. The arrow points to the location of the breakage.

If a pile should break during installation, the standard procedure is to install another pile adjacent to the broken pile. Often the new pile will be offset a distance of 5 ft (1.5 m) from the broken pile. Grade beams are often used to tie together the piles and thus the location of the new pile should be in-line with the proposed grade beam location. The structural engineer will need to redesign the grade beam for its longer span.

After the piles have been successfully installed, the next step is to construct the remainder of the foundation, as follows:  Construct the Remainder of the Foundation - Piles.

Downdrag Loads on Pile Groups.

The downdrag load on a pile group or pier group is more complicated. Two possible downdrag loading conditions for the group must be calculated, as follows:

1. Large spacing of piles. If the piles are spaced far apart, then it is likely that the downdrag will act on each pile separately. Equations 6.21 and 6.22 can be used to determine the downdrag load for each pile. The downdrag of each pile in the group would then be summed up in order to calculate the total downdrag for a given pile group.

2. Small spacing of piles. When the pile spacing is small, the downdrag load may act effectively on the entire perimeter of the group, in which case the following equations are utilized:

For square pile groups in cohesionless soil subjected to downdrag:

For square pile groups in cohesive soil subjected to downdrag:

As a conservative approach, the downdrag load should be calculated for both cases outlined above and the maximum value used for design.

Example Problem 6.9 Consider the same situation as the previous example, except that there is a 2 by 2 pier group. The piers are spaced 3 pier diameters (centerline to centerline). Determine the downdrag load on the pier group.

Solution Since there are four piers in the 2 by 2 group and assuming each pier is separately subjected to a downdrag load, or:
The second downdrag condition is to use Eq. 6.24, or:
Hence the governing condition would be assuming the downdrag over the entire perimeter of the pier group, or QD = 960,000 lb (4300 kN).